I
admit that in many ways I’m probably what you would call an armchair feminist.
I don’t go to demonstrations, I’m not a member of any feminist groups, I’m just
a woman who thinks she should be equal to a man and who gets annoyed seeing the
many ways women are still treated differently (and normally worse). However, I’ve
started regularly checking a blogging site called “Mädchenmannschaft” (Girl’s Team, they mostly write in German,
though) that is definitely feminist. And I have understood why we’re actually
doing more of a roll-back than of an advance.
Every
time I see a post that deals with ‘mainstream’ feminists - or women who speak
out for feminism, but are not considered feminists per se, like Emma Watson
when she spoke in front of the UN - I see the writers spewing their anger, definitely
deciding that a white, heterosexual woman from a first world country and with a
certain fame can’t speak for ‘us’ women. But, by that definition, who is ‘us’
women? I am from a first world country, I’m white, I’m heterosexual (I’d say I’m
casual-sexual, because sex doesn’t take up a lot of time in my life, but I’m
not completely without a sex drive, like an asexual person), the only thing I’m
not is famous. Not that I miss it…
I
do agree Alice Schwarzer
definitely doesn’t speak for all women, either. It seems to me that by now she
has ‘lost contact’ with problems a lot of women have these days. And then there’s
the bank account in Switzerland she has to take care of. I do agree that in
many discussions, women from other areas of the world, from Africa, India,
Asia, South America, are underrepresented. I do agree that I, like most white
people from a first world country, have a certain prerogative.
It
seems, women more than men have an instinct to immediately be at each other’s
throats. There is no other explanation. I can understand, to a certain degree,
that a woman of colour would not feel represented by a white woman (or a
Caucasian one or whatever the current politically correct word is, not that I
care, I see political correctness as a disease). The same goes the other way
around, naturally. What I can’t understand is the anger and outright hate the
writers of Mädchenmannschaft often display. Emma Watson may not be a true and tired feminist (yet
and, the way she was treated, probably never), but that doesn’t make what she
said any less true. And just because something comes from a white woman who
happens to live in Europe or North America and also happens to like guys more
than girls, it doesn’t have to be untrue for everyone else.
We
all have our battlefields, our topics within the large realm of feminism that
are most important to us. Some of us have to fight more because of their skin
colour, some of us have to fight more because of the people they choose to
love. But what use is it, really, to fight each other over those differences?
As long as another feminist is not belittling you for your skin colour or
choice in lovers, there is no reason to attack them. And just because a white
woman’s point of view is different from yours, that doesn’t make her less or
you more of a feminist. The same goes the other way around as well. Each human
has a different point of view - because we all have different experiences in
life.
And
as long as every young woman speaking about feminism without being considered a
feminist has to fear the claws and fangs of the feminists, they will not join
us. In the 1980s, the women wanted to be feminists, they wanted to be equal,
they were looking for strong role models. And they got them.
Since
the 1990s, the role models have vanished again. Barbie got even thinner. The ‘good-looking’
woman got a lot thinner. Admittedly, shoulder pads have gone out of style with
good reason, but in the 1980s, woman wanted to look broad-shouldered and strong,
like men.
Today
we’ve gone back to sexist advertisements by the score, to weak female
characters in movies, TV series, and computer games. And we’re surprised young
women won’t join our ‘club’ any longer? Would you join a club where people are
shouting at you for daring to say something? Where they’re shouting at you,
because you weren’t born in Africa, Asia, South America, or India (or at least
to ancestors from those places), but ‘dared’ to be born in Europe or North
America? The answer, I think, is pretty obvious.
Sheathe
those claws, cover those fangs again. Use them against those who are really
against equality of the sexes (and for me, that includes all kinds of sexual
orientation).
We have a lot of problems
still to solve, but ‘black versus white,’ ‘poor versus rich,’ ‘one sexual
orientation versus all other’ among ourselves should not be among them, yet. We
can work those out once we’re equal to men.
No comments:
Post a Comment